The Law Office of Bill Wells specializes in cases involving injuries and deaths caused as a result of negligence. Mr. Wells has been actively representing clients in negligence litigation for 24 years and has been certified as a specialist in the field of Personal Injury Trial Law by the Texas Supreme Court since 1990. Cases handled by Mr. Wells' office include*:
| AUTO/TRUCK/MOTORCYCLE ACCIDENTS |
|
A Beaumont man suffered severe injury in a motorcycle/pick-up truck intersection accident. The driver of the pick-up truck was cited by the police for running a red light. Mr. Wells' client, on the motorcycle, went through the intersection on a green light. The pick-up truck driver immediately blamed the accident on a railroad for a crossing malfunction that caused a dangerous disruption of the intersection traffic control signals. The railroad company persistently denied the existence of malfunctions. Deposition testimony from witnesses, ranging from store owners, school district administrators, school bus drivers, and area residents was consistent in establishing that the railroad crossing had malfunctioned (falsely activated causing the crossing arms to go down or up and down without a train on the track) over many years. The railroad crossing malfunctions were the subject of news media reports in Beaumont. The railroad company settled the case with Mr. Wells' client just short of trial. A hunter was catastrophically injured when he drove into the side of a 48' trailer attached as part of an 18 wheeler tractor trailer rig. The accident happened on a dark, rural Texas highway late at night when the 18 wheeler operator pulled from a stop sign onto the highway. The police investigation found fault on our client for hitting the 48' trailer that was blocking his lane of traffic. The resulting collision and injury was horrible and due to the severity of injury, our client had no recollection of the accident. After investigating the accident scene, talking to witnesses and looking at the damage done to the vehicles we filed a lawsuit on behalf of our client. Our investigation revealed: 1) the driver of the 18-wheeler rig was an inexperienced driver and had a documented history of difficulty of starting from a stopped position; 2) the tractor trailer operator was illegally operating his truck on a road mark ed "No Thru Trucks" when he entered the highway; 3) the tractor trailer operator failed to submit a driver's log, failed to keep an employee file, and failed to submit to a drug/alcohol test following this accident; 4) the tractor trailer operator was attempting to illegally park his rig on the side of the highway when this accident occurred, contributing to his slow movement in blocking the main lanes of traffic on the Texas highway; 5) the evidence proved that the 48' trailer was totally blocking our client's lane of traffic as he approached at night at highway speed; 6) that underride and undercarriage accidents have been extensively studied and these studies prove that nighttime crashes result because of extraordinarily difficulty in distinguishing a trailer blocking a lane of traffic at night in time to avoid the collision. In the time it takes to see, perceive, decide what to do, and then do it, studies have indicated a driver of a vehicle at highway speeds needs approximately 1300 feet of roadway to adequately respond. Our client had less than one-half of this distance and the result was a horrible injury as a result of the negligence of the operator of the 18 wheeler tractor trailer rig. Studies have shown that slow moving trucks create little contrast at night; that driver's at night perceive truck markings as roadside markings or distant taillights; that a trailer at night will not be conspicuous and that a driver's headlights will illuminate the trailer only at a distance of 100' to 200' and there will not be time to stop; that an unloaded flatbed trailer is virtually invisible blocking a lane of traffic at night; that ambient lights in the area of the accident will make it even more difficult to identify and react to a trailer blocking a lane of traffic at night. After identifying the facts of this collision and presenting these facts to the insurance company for the truck driver, the trucking company settled with our client. |
| INDUSTRIAL ACCIDENTS |
|
A Galveston County welder was working for a contractor in an industrial facility in Houston. A violent explosion tossed the welder thru the air and caused a closed head injury. Immediate investigation of the accident by Mr. Wells' office along with an industry consultant hired by Mr. Wells' office revealed the force of the blast. Fault and cause of the welder's injury were in dispute in the litigation. The industrial facility settled with the injured welder during litigation. |
| PREMISES LIABILITY |
|
A Harris County EMS worker was injured when he slipped on a wet hallway at his office building. Investigation in the lawsuit revealed that a doctor's office in the building negotiated a deal with the building landlord to mop the floors at night. The doctor delegated this job to a nurse who had no experience in office building maintenance. A Harris County jury returned a verdict in favor of the EMS worker. A warehouse store shopper suffered deep and life threatening lacerations as a result of falling merchandise. Our client was shopping at the national warehouse store when a razor sharp piece of flashing fell from the shelf and hit his arm on the way down. A quick thinking customer applied pressure and a tourniquet to his arms to prevent a fatal loss of blood. Investigation revealed that this warehouse store had many prior event of flashing falling off the shelves and even had events of flashing falling off the shelves and causing almost identical injury with significant lacerations. Falling merchandise events are well documented and have caused many injuries and deaths. In this particular store, one side of the flashing isle had the flashing properly secured to prevent falling merchandise, but the other side of the isle, where our client was injured, oddly did not have the flashing properly secured. The flashing was overstocked and was stacked all the way to the lip of the shelf, was not adequately secured and fell causing the near fatal injury. The warehouse store settled with out client when presented with these facts. |
| PRODUCT LIABILITY |
|
A Houston family brought a claim in the Harris County District Court for the tragic loss of their son as a result of a choking death caused by a food product manufactured in Taiwan. Upon investigation by our office, it was discovered that the product had been responsible for the deaths of children in Taiwan, Japan, Canada, and the United States. The Japanese government and the Taiwanese government had previously investigated the series of deaths associated with the product and had been highly critical of the design and warnings associated with the product. The product was imported to the United States following the string of deaths in Japan and Taiwan and ultimately took the life of a Houston child. Litigation was filed in Houston and within days of filing the lawsuit the Houston Chronicle published an investigative story that brought the series of events to the public eye. The retailer that sold the product in Houston discontinued selling the product and the United States Food and Drug Administration banned the product from import into the United States. The Defendants in the litigation settled with the Houston family. The family, who suffered an unbearable loss, gained some solace in knowing that they helped remove this deadly product from entry into the United States. |
| MEDICAL NEGLIGENCE |
|
A Jefferson County resident was admitted to a Beaumont Hospital with a ruptured aortic aneurysm. Mr. Wells' client survived the surgery and was admitted. The hospital records revealed that in the days to follow the patient's documented deteriorating lower extremity cardiovascular condition was ignored by the patient's surgical team. The patient had both legs amputated above the knee as a result of the loss of circulation that was not addressed by the surgeon. The Defendant settled the litigation by payment of their insurance policy limit of litigation. |
| EXPLOSIONS |
|
A Galveston County welder was working for a contractor in an industrial facility in Houston. A violent explosion tossed the welder thru the air and caused a closed head injury. Immediate investigation of the accident by Mr. Wells' office along with an industry consultant hired by Mr. Wells' office revealed the force of the blast. Fault and cause of the welder's injury were in dispute in the litigation. The industrial facility settled with the injured welder during litigation. |
| ON-THE-JOB INJURY |
|
A Brazoria County resident was working at her restaurant job in Houston and was in the process of checking in a vendor when the vendor allowed a bread cart to fall off the lift of the vendor's truck. The bread cart fell on Mr. Wells' client and caused a severe leg fracture. Litigation investigation revealed the vendor, in the operation of his lift and truck, violated instructions that were written on the side of the truck. The Defendant settled the case by payment to Mr. Wells' client of litigation. |
| JONES ACT |
|
A crew man aboard a barge sustained a back injury moving a full 55-gallon drum. Litigation investigation revealed that the vessel operator did not have appropriate equipment for the crew member to use in his job. The Defendant settled the case with Mr. Wells' client. |
| CONSTRUCTION DEFECTS |
|
A homeowner, while cleaning his patio roof, fell when a support broke and severely fractured his arm. A builder's consultant hired by Mr. Wells' office recognized that support brackets were not installed which caused the roof to give way. The contractor who installed the patio roof settled the litigation with Mr. Wells' client. |
*Each case is different. Similar results may not be obtained in your case. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. |




